You
realize your car is a lemon. The first thing you do is to contact the
dealership. The vehicle may be under warranty. In this case, the
dealer might ask you to contact the manufacturer for repairs.
The
makers may take the lemon for repairs. Despite many attempts, the
defect remains. The company sold you a lemon. The manufacturer might
advise you to seek arbitration. They may not like a court case. Why?
Because mediation serves the maker’s interest.
Arbitration
under Car
Lemon Law in California
benefits the company. Consumers may lose their claim. Or they may be
awarded an additional repair visit.
Difference
between lawsuit and arbitration
Manufacturers
choose three types of arbitration-
1
– Manufacturer –sponsored arbitrators
The
makers use a neutral third party company as arbitrators. These
companies rely on the auto manufacturer. The company creates these
independent companies. The verdict may be unfair.
2
– The arbitrator’s decision can be used against you
You
can still take the manufacturer to court if the ruling is against
you. However, whatever the arbitrator decides can be held against you
in court. You won’t get the chance to ask any questions. It is like
working against yourself.
3
- BBB Auto Line
You
face a panel of arbitrators sponsored by the manufacturer. These
arbitrators review your situation. They can order repairs or partial
or full refunds.
Conclusion
Increase
your chances of fair compensation. Consult with experienced attorneys
well versed with Car Lemon Law in California. Consider the winning
track record of a law firm. You stand to gain the maximum.
0 comments:
Post a Comment