If you are deciding to contest your Lemon Law in Idaho case, then it is possible that you might have heard about arbitration. Usually, arbitration is requested by the manufacturer. Their main notion behind this idea is to avoid going to court.
However, there is more to arbitration than just avoiding court.
Read this blog to know why you must avoid arbitration.
1- Arbiter isn’t neutral:
The manufacturer sponsors arbiter. So, you can expect that the panel will work for them and do what is asked. And that is why the chances of arbitration not working in your favor are maximum. So, it is best that you avoid it.
2- Arbiter can rule against you:
If you feel that the ruling of arbiter was against you, then you can take your case to court too. But, the decision of the arbiter will be taken into consideration and will be used in averse to you as substantive evidence. And at last, you will get no opportunity to raise any cross-questions.
3- Manufacturer may convince you:
When there is arbitration involved, you will have no lawyer by your side. If you have no knowledge about the lemon law, your manufacturer may end up convincing you on dropping the case in return to a minor obligation.
Bottom line
It is quite evident that arbitration is never in the interest of the consumer under Idaho lemon law. That is why it is an educated decision to avoid it.
Hire a good attorney for yourself and contest the case from a legal viewpoint and only in the court.
To know more about Lemon Law in New York please visit our website: allenstewart.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment